The Primary Election Results appear below. They are unofficial until certified by the Bergen County Clerk.
Unofficial Results (detailed with write-ins)
Charting the Goings-On in Teaneck
The Primary Election Results appear below. They are unofficial until certified by the Bergen County Clerk.
Unofficial Results (detailed with write-ins)
Those that care about local issues will no longer hear about them
Those that do not care about local issues, won’t vote in council / BOE races anyway (look at the numbers)Township managers must remain independent of party bosses’ influence
There’s a move underfoot to move non-partisan Council elections (held in May) to November, to coincide with general partisan elections.
We moved the election from November to May in 1930, when Teaneck was nearly bankrupted by partisan forces.
Since then, powers in Trenton have tried many times to move back to partisan elections, with a first step of moving the Municipal Elections to November. Continue reading “Moving Elections to November: The part they won’t mention”
The questions I raised about the referendum to move Teaneck’s non-partisan Council elections to November, should be looked at carefully.
One argument put forward is that the BOE has already done this.
Let’s take a look at the data.
Not every November election is the same. Let’s examine the three basic types of November elections:
For each type of November election, I looked at three metrics:
This chart represents the results: Continue reading “May-November Relationship: Does the turnout argument have merit?”
The clerk of the Township of Teaneck sent the following response to petitioners on Tuesday, August 17th.
Petitioners have brought suit in Bergen County Superior Court.
In the clerk’s letter, several deficiencies in the petition are noted.
In the lawsuit, the petitioners seem to agree there are deficiencies, but ask the judge to “liberally construe all such petitions“.
We will continue to monitor for developments.
The clerk of the Township of Teaneck received the petition on July 9th.
The review then commenced and his office responded to the petitioners within the 20 days allotted by statute.
The letter below lays out the information as to why his office was not permitted to certify the petition and gives the petitioners 10 days to cure the defects.
You may have seen them with the clipboard already. There’s a proposal underfoot to change the way elections are done in town.
Save money and get more people out, what could you possibly have against it?
As far as pitches go, this one is fairly simple – and the clipboard is currently seeking signatures to move Council’s non-partisan elections to November.
But we should remember H.L. Mencken: “For every complex problem, there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong.”
We moved the election from November to May in 1930, when Teaneck was nearly bankrupted by partisan forces. Since then, powers in Trenton have tried many times to move back to partisan elections, with a first step of moving the Municipal Elections to November.
Attacks started right away. By 1938, this was reported:
As of 2021, Teaneck has always resisted the move to November.
In 1942, the Bergen Record published a major editorial entitled: The Battle of Teaneck.
They decried the possibility of a return to partisanship, concluding:
Some 20 years later, here’s what Mayor Matthew “Matty” Feldman had to say in 1962:
“In order to continue attracting the Werner Schmids [ed note: Mr. Schmid was the manager after Paul Volcker reitred], the Clara Christensens and the Marion Browns to Teaneck’s employ, we must maintain our aloofness from partisan politics.
This is not to suggest that Teaneck’s citizens are to isolate themselves from the mainstream of American politics; on the contrary, we have active Democratic and Republican Clubs, and that is all to the good. But we cannot permit the intrusion of these political groups into our Councilmanic elections. Under our form of government, there is no room for politics and this is a concept which we must guard jealously.”
Voter’s Guide from the League of Women Voters is available below
Download the entire guide here: LWV 2021 Primary Candidate’s Voter’s Guide
After audio surfaced of Alexandra Soriano-Taveras calling for a boycott of Cedar Lane businesses, questions began to swarm about her fitness to represent the 37th District, which includes Teaneck, in the NJ Assembly.
Yesterday, Soriano-Taveras released a statement (see full statement below) via InsiderNJ.
“There was a call to action in Teaneck this past summer and I attended to speak up and speak out against our town leadership who once again was not listening to the voices of our community.”
Continue reading “Soriano-Taveras Apologizes for ‘Doing Nothing Wrong’ in Calling for Boycott”
This year, Teaneck saw record turnout at the polls. One member of the Board of Education received more votes than any local office holder in the history of the municipality.
Resident Tom Abbott, made a comment here, providing a link to details on his website, where he broke down the voter numbers. And one thing stuck out to to me. Three of the districts, at first glance, seemed to have far fewer registered voters than others.
Districts should have, roughly, an even number of registered voters. But as I started to look into the issue, I found that Teaneck, compared to its neighbors also has far fewer districts.
Fact: Teaneck has the highest number of registered voters for any Municipality in Bergen County.
We do NOT have the greatest number of Election Districts.
Why not?
Hackensack, with over 6,000 fewer registered voters than Teaneck, has 25 election districts, compared to our 23.
Fair Lawn, with over 5,000 fewer registered voters than Teaneck, has the same number of districts as us.
When it comes to the average number of voters per district, Teaneck packs more in than anyone.
And when you look at our districts, the numbers of registered voters they contain, are all over the place. Despite an average of 1,258 voters, some districts (e.g. 12) have 1,776 while others (e.g. 16) have a mere 788.
There are several reasons.
There is a County Committee pursuant to Title 19, Section 19:5-3
Membership and organization of county committees; vacancies; certification of unit of representation and number of election districts.
NJ Rev Stat § 19:5-3 (2013)
As you can see from the By-Laws of the Bergen County Democratic Committee:
The County Committee shall be composed of one male and one female member elected at the Biannual Primary Election by the Democratic voters of each election district of the County pursuant to law.
– Section 1. ELECTED MEMBERSHIP
and the By-Laws of the Bergen County Republican Committee:
Section 1. The membership of this organization shall be composed of members of the Bergen County Republican County Committee who have been duly elected or appointed pursuant to Title 19.
– Art. III, Section 1. Membership
On the local level, there is a municipal committee for each party, comprised of one male and one female from each election district.
The members of the municipal committees of political parties shall consist of the elected members of the county committee resident in the respective municipalities
NJ Rev Stat § 19:5-2 (2013)
So, as an example, while Teaneck has 2.25x as many registered voters in District 12 as it does in District 16, both get two representatives. And while Hackensack has over 6,000 FEWER registered voters than Teaneck, they get MORE representation at the County Committee because they have more election districts.
When one election district has 2.2x as many registered voters, the lines are 2.2x as long. The volunteers are asked to work 2.2x as hard. The number of machines / ballots and equipment needed is in part based on the number of expected voters.
In Title 19, Section 19:4-13, the relevant numbers to look for are election districts with more than 750 or less than 250 votes cast in any two consecutive general elections.
19:4-13. Readjustment of boundaries for correct number of voters
When in any two consecutive general elections in an election district more than 750 or less than 250 votes shall have been cast, the county board shall readjust the boundary lines of such election district and other election districts necessary to effect changes so that none of the election districts affected shall have more than 750 registered voters, and for this purpose shall have power to consolidate any number of districts and subdivide the same.
NJ Rev Stat § 19:4-13 (2016)
How many Teaneck Districts had more than 750 votes cast in two consecutive general elections?
Here’s the breakdown:


We have 7 election districts that have consecutively had more than 750 voters, and all but three did, this year.
No. Because our elections are “at-large”, meaning that you vote for members of Town Council and Board of Education regardless of where you live, redistricting will have no effect on our elections. Whoever receives the most votes will still win.
That is what I intend to look at. On Tuesday, I will present the information above to the Council and ask that we create a task force to look at our election districts. We should have clean and clear districts, with roughly the same number of voters in each.
To bring down the average number of voters at the polls to the maximum permitted (750), would require an additional 7 districts.
We currently average over 1,250 registered voters in each of our 23 districts. Bringing that number down to 750 would mean adding 16 districts.
UPDATE: The unofficial results have been updated as returns are coming in. The post has been updated to reflect the new unofficial stats.
While ballots may still be counted for the next 10 days, as mail arrives, here are the unofficial counts from Bergen County for Teaneck.
Official Link to updated results (11/4/20)
Official Link to results (11/3/20)
Here is a breakdown of turnout by district. I made this based on information received from the County. It’s subject to change and I can’t verify the accuracy of the information. It also may not count those recently registered to vote. But, it’s the best I have at the moment.
| District | Voted | Registered | Turnout |
| 1 | 863 | 1,118 | 77.2% |
| 2 | 1,047 | 1,471 | 71.2% |
| 3 | 1,040 | 1,321 | 78.7% |
| 4 | 963 | 1,226 | 78.5% |
| 5 | 719 | 964 | 74.6% |
| 6 | 861 | 1,143 | 75.3% |
| 7 | 873 | 1,176 | 74.2% |
| 8 | 1,123 | 1,362 | 82.5% |
| 9 | 1,054 | 1,366 | 77.2% |
| 10 | 1,190 | 1,552 | 76.7% |
| 11 | 1,029 | 1,387 | 74.2% |
| 12 | 1,378 | 1,776 | 77.6% |
| 13 | 873 | 1,179 | 74.0% |
| 14 | 1,159 | 1,596 | 72.6% |
| 15 | 856 | 1,262 | 67.8% |
| 16 | 560 | 788 | 71.1% |
| 17 | 1,015 | 1,350 | 75.2% |
| 18 | 1,136 | 1,453 | 78.2% |
| 19 | 982 | 1,224 | 80.2% |
| 20 | 726 | 901 | 80.6% |
| 21 | 1,109 | 1,441 | 77.0% |
| 22 | 850 | 1,103 | 77.1% |
| 23 | 795 | 1,122 | 70.9% |
| Total | 22,201 | 29,281 | 75.8% |
| Voted | Registered | Turnout | |
| Dem | 13,419 | 16,320 | 82.2% |
| Rep | 2,933 | 3,721 | 78.8% |
| Una | 5,710 | 8,987 | 63.5% |
| 22,062 | 29,281 | 75.3% |
Thank you to the Teaneck League of Women Voters for putting together this forum and Q&A for the candidates:
Download the guide here: Voters-Guide-Teaneck-BOE-2020.pdf
Below please find the polling locations/district allocations for the 2020 Presidential General Election:
TEANECK
*A notice will be sent to your registered address from Bergen County notifying you of your assigned polling location. If you do not receive this notice in the next few weeks please contact any of the election offices for guidance.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the above information, please do not hesitate to reach out to our office or any of the election offices:
Bergen County Clerk, Elections
(201) 336-7020 electionsclerk@co.bergen.nj.us
Bergen County Board of Elections
(201) 336-6230 , elections@co.bergen.nj.us
Bergen County Superintendent of Elections
(201)-336-6115 , soe@co.bergen.nj.us
Township of Teaneck Township Clerk’s Office
(201) 837-1600 x1025 , clerk@teanecknj.gov
For more information:
https://www.teanecknj.gov/news/post/10118/
https://www.teanecknj.gov/news/post/9976/