Who created the Cannabis Survey and sent it out to residents?
Who created the Cannabis Forum at the Rodda Center?
Who directed employees to attend / work at the event?
The answers matter, because Council may only act as a body, not as individuals or even a subcommittee (a group of 1-3 members of council formed to discuss issues)
“It is the intention of this article that the municipal council shall act in all the matters as a body, and it is contrary to the spirit of this article for any of its members to seek individually to influence the official acts of the municipal manager… The council and its members shall deal with the administrative service solely through the manager and shall not give orders to any subordinates of the manager, either publicly or privately.”
source: NJ Rev Stat § 40:69A-91
Continue reading “Has the Teaneck Cannabis Subcommittee been operating in violation of State law?”
I got a ticket.
I parked in front of my house on October 10th and I got a summons for doing so.
The summons alleges that I violated Ordinance 36-12.1 — PROHIBITED PARKING AT ALL TIMES EXCEPT SAT, SUN, HOLIDAY
And in fact, I admit that is the correct ordinance for my block (the code is now text searchable, so it’s easy to find).
I will also admit that the correct signage exists (my car was parked right under the sign). Continue reading “Sometimes it’s appropriate to fight city hall”
In October 2020, the Al Ummah Community Center (also known as AUCC) commenced a lawsuit against the Township, the Zoning Board of Adjustment, Building Department officials, and others.
This week, Judge Kevin McNulty dismissed the amended complaint (without prejudice) largely for the reasons I outlined back in October 2020.
Teaneck was represented by Thomas B. Hanrahan of Hanrahan Pack, LLC.
What was the suit about?
UPDATE (11/20/22): Plaintiffs filed another amended complaint on Friday, 11/18. It will take a little while to evaluate the new / changing claims)
As per Plaintiffs:
“This case is about religious liberties and the discriminatory and unequal practices of the Teaneck, its employees, and its Zoning Board of Adjustments… Despite years and thousands of dollars spent to appease the Defendants’ unlawful and discriminatory requirements, Defendants continue to act in violation of the Constitutions of the United States and New Jersey, as well as the Federal law explicitly prohibiting religious discrimination by discriminating against the Plaintiffs and imposing an unlawful burden on the practice of their faith.”
– Page 2 of amended complaint (Introduction)
Did the town discriminate against AUCC? Or was something else going on?
As it turned out, Judge McNulty said the case was more about the difficulties of land use and getting projects through boards.
“AUCC’s frustration is palpable. It emphasizes in the amended complaint that it has been “going through this process for years with no end in sight.” (Compl. ¶213.) Adding insult to injury, the ZBA has demanded that AUCC put up more money to fund its continued application process. (Id. ¶162.) The delay and AUCC’s frustration, however, are hardly unique in the annals of local land use regulation, and the process does seem to be at least potentially moving ahead, on a revised legal basis.”
– Opinion at page 14
Let’s run through the opinion: Continue reading “AUCC Lawsuit Update: Dismissed”
The “unofficial” results from the town are below.
Note: These do not include Early Voting or VBM, which will be added in by the County (not all numbers are yet available on their site).
But the “live” numbers (available here) seem to include the early voting totals. Based on this data, it would appear that at least 3 of the challengers Continue reading “Election Results: November 2022”
Teaneck is a well-run town!
But don’t take our word for it! There’s independent proof.
Every year, independent auditors review our municipal financial records and processes and Moody’s rates us for bonding.
Moody’s rated Teaneck with the second highest rating “Aa2”
Here’s the bottom line on our deficiencies:
In my previous post, I spoke about misinformation regarding bonding and how taxation works for various projects. Today, I want to speak to the projects contemplated for Stop & Shop, American Legion Drive, and Cedar Lane.
- Fact: Teaneck wants and has always wanted, Stop & Shop to stay and thrive (and even expand) in its current location.
- Fact: Teaneck never asked or pressured Stop & Shop to close or move; Stop & Shop is not looking to close or move.
- Fact: Other than concepts discussed by the parties, no plans exist for the area and no plans have been approved either by the Council or the Planning Board.
- Fact: Any future plans for the area are still subject to many open public meetings, with legal notice
- Fact: All plans being contemplated are voluntary to help businesses in the area.
So what’s been happening with Stop & Shop?
Of all the issues I speak to residents about, this may be one where the most misinformation is being spread.
Let’s talk about what’s been happening here.
Most people agree that we want a robust Stop & Shop that serves the needs of the town. At that point, the rumors spread like wildfire.
On the Township Website, Stop & Shop & the Township posted a joint statement:
“Stop & Shop, in conjunction with the Township of Teaneck, is issuing this memo in the hope of dispelling the rumors circulating in the community that Stop & Shop’s Teaneck store might close. The Township never asked or pressured Stop & Shop to close its store and Stop & Shop is not looking to close or move from its present Teaneck location on American Legion Drive.”
So what is the Town trying to do?
Continue reading “Combatting Misinformation: Stop & Shop (American Legion Drive)”
One area which has a lot of people sharing misinformation is Municipal Bonding.
FACT: Teaneck’s Bonding Ratio is the lowest of neighboring municipalities (links to State numbers below).
Bonding or municipal debt is a terrific thing when used appropriately. The current council has one of the lowest bonding percentages compared with neighboring towns and comparisons to other parts of your tax bill show the benefits.
Let’s explain the basics:
For the following three projects, would you prefer the Town / BOE tax or bond the items?
- 5.35 miles of road repaving (cost is approx. $1M per mile)
- $5.35M for Renovation of Kindergarten Building & Admin Offices by Thomas Jefferson Middle School
Let’s start with some basic facts:
- Value of all land in Teaneck (as of 10/01/2020): $5,188,972,400
- Value of Average Residential Assessment: $387,405
- Percentage of total land value: .007466%
(stats from “User-Friendly budget” available on Township website)
Share of each $5.35M project for the average homeowner = $399.43
The $399.43 can be paid through the tax levy (all at once) or bonded (at near-zero interest) to be paid back over decades.
Bonding a project or paying for it through direct levy is a policy and financial decision that affects YOU!
So what would you prefer? Pay it all now or $19.97 a year for 20 years?
Let’s see how it works for two theoretical homeowners (you and a neighbor)
As you can see below, by bonding for roads, we pay them over time. If you choose to move, you only paid for the period you lived in Teaneck and used the item. But when the Kindergarten renovations and BOE Offices were taxed directly through the local levy, you paid all of it — in 2019 dollars, despite the fact you may not have intended to live here the following 20 years.
Interest Rates Matter Continue reading “Combatting Misinformation: Bonding”
At this evening’s council meeting, we will vote on ordinance 21-2022:
ADOPTING A REVISION AND CODIFICATION OF THE ORDINANCES OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK
When the Township Council passes a law, we do so by ordinance. Each ordinance lasts until it is removed.
That creates problems, such as when the State makes an update that pre-empts a local law.
Sometimes this type of State Law rule change is benign: A Teaneck-specific hands-free car phone use ordinance was passed decades ago. When the State of NJ passed a similar State statute, it nullified ours, but because it was duplicative, nothing much changed as far as practice went (other than police citing a different rule when issuing a summons).
Sometimes, this type of State Law rule change is not benign: A resident called me a few years back because their neighbor had a pool without a fence and our code mandated fences around all pools — and they feared the worst for their kids and others. Except, it turns out that NJ adopted Continue reading “Re-Codification of the Teaneck Code: August 30, 2022”
The map and list for this weekend’s garage sale is now live, the PDF list and interactive map can be found here:
Continue reading “Town-Wide Garage Sale (July 23-24, 2022)”
The Teaneck Police Department was asked to conduct a report as to traffic and safety on Larch Avenue (in the area of Terhune Street).
Here are the findings:
On Monday, April 25, 2022, the Traffic Bureau was asked to conduct a speed survey on Shepard Avenue. This request was prompted by a Shepard Avenue resident, Gina McCullars, who was concerned about a speeding problem.
A site survey determined that Shepard Avenue is a twenty-five-mile-per-hour two-lane Continue reading “Shepard Ave Traffic Study and Police Reports”