Because of the significant uptick in positive COVID-19 cases in the Teaneck community, the manager has made the decision to close all municipal buildings to the public effective Tuesday, December 21, 2021.
The municipal buildings will remain closed to the public through Monday, January 17, 2022. We will reopen our facilities to the public on Tuesday, January 18, 2022 contingent upon data showing COVID-19 cases have declined to a safe level, and our health officer determines it’s appropriate to do so. The January 18, 2022 reopening date allows us to safely get through the Holiday season, and the fourteen (14) day post-Holiday incubation period.
Please note that the Sunshine Garden and after-school program will continue to operate at the Rodda Center until December 23, 2021. Continue reading “Township Manager re Uptick in Omicron Cases: Municipal Building Access Changes Effective 12/21/21”
From a resident:
I heard a rumor about the Town knocking down Stop & Shop, is that true?
We heard this too. It’s alarmist and incorrect.
We will do our best to explain exactly what the town has been looking at in that area. Source documents are included below with links to the originals. Continue reading “Area In Need Of Redevelopment: American Legion Drive”
Remarks for Veterans Day, 11/11/21
Keith Kaplan, Councilman
Without veterans, without the service to a cause larger than yourselves, many of us simply would not be here today. That service, right here in NJ, earned my grandfather his citizenship — and on behalf of the Township Council and the Township of Teaneck, I want to wish everyone a happy Veterans Day and thank you for your service.
We owe our veterans a profound debt. Not merely for service, but for what that service has meant foto us all.
The history of any town is the history of its people. And veterans have always been an integral part of what has made Teaneck what we are. Even before we had our own name, our sons and daughters sacrificed for our freedoms in the 22nd infantry of Bergen County during the Civil War.
Last year, I focused on this day, at this time – and how it was inextricably linked to WWI and the Armistice signed to end the fighting for that “War to End all Wars”. In many ways, we still mirror that time, including a world struck with a global pandemic.
Just as we are meeting here today, Judge A. Demorest Del Mar spoke here in 1938. Del Mar was a lieutenant in the Navy during WWI and he said to those assembled: “We fought to retain that which we value above all earthly things – liberty. We will fight again and again to preserve it if necessary.”
Unfortunately, those words would become true too soon.
Today, I wanted to take a little time to talk about Teaneck’s WWII veterans and specifically the way Teaneck was molded by their service. Continue reading “Kaplan: Remarks on Veterans Day, 11am, 11/11/2021”
For the first time, residents of NJ were able to vote in-person, before election day in various spots throughout the county.
Here’s some of the data I have received thus far:
How many voted?
Continue reading “Early Voting: A brief overview of the early data”
Here’s what I know as of 7am on 11/3:
The ability of the County to add 3 numbers and provide a “Total” does not appear to be a thing.
The County has results of various sorts listed here:
As per the “Unofficial General Election Results link, the winners are currently Klein, Rodriguez and Greene.
The link appears to only show two of the sets of numbers above. There are three:
- Early Voting
- Election Day
- Vote by Mail
Adding the election day totals and early voting totals appears to give the results that the County is currently posting on their site and that I posted last night.
When adding the Vote by Mail at the link above, the results change:
Why didn’t the County add the VBM to the results?
Were these all of the VBMs?
Are there more VBMs coming in?
These are open questions and I do not yet have the answers. But these are the links and numbers available thus far.
In 2019, the Teaneck Board of Education hired Whitehall Associates, Inc. (a qualified demographer by the New Jersey Department of Education) to conduct an independent analysis of the effects of new development on the Teaneck Schools. The analysis (available here) projected enrollments based on particular projects and to the overall school system through the 2023-24 school year. Some of the numbers were purely projections (as the pre-k and K classes hadn’t been born yet), but the rest were based on trends and the scientific methodology as outlined in the report and consistent with NJDOE practices.
So how good were the predictions?
To find that out, I contacted Superintendent Dr. Christopher Irving and asked for information regarding the number of students in these locations.
Below is a list of the predictions from Table 4 of the report and the corresponding chart indicates how well those predictions have been borne out in reality.
|Location||# of Apartment|
|Predicted # |
of school age
|Actual # of|
|1500 Teaneck Road||226||44||14||-30
|1775 Windsor Road (Avalon)||248||63||28||-35
|890 Palisade Avenue||7||4||0||-4
|1387 Hill Street||7||2||0||-2
|764 New Bridge Road||19||1||0||-1
|1475 Palisade Avenue||120||28||4||-24
|227 Teaneck Road||24||7||11||+4
Out of the predicted 150 school-age children attending the Teaneck Schools, only 57 have moved into these developments.
Broken down by school, the numbers show an average of 1-2 kids per class, max. In short, there is roughly zero impact on the top line item in the school budget: staff, based on the people moving into new developments.
|School||# of students
|Bryant Elementary School||6
|AUCC‐ PK Location||1
|Lowell Elementary School||8
|Whittier Elementary School||10
|Benjamin Franklin Middle School||5
|Thomas Jefferson Middle School||2
|Teaneck High School||19
|Out of District||1
Teaneck BOE: Independent Demographic Study of Impact of New Development
There are 2 Municipal Questions on the Ballot this year.
Question #1: Moving the date of Council Elections
- Local elections deserve attention
- Very little focus on local issues in November amid Presidential / Congressional races
- Traditionally nonpartisan races were in May and Partisan Races were in November to remove crossover influence
- While turnout can be higher in some November races, the votes for non-partisan (e.g. BOE races) do not increase proportionately as voters skip these important races.
Question #2: Community Choice Aggregation.
- This proposal allows for the purchase of Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) to offset energy use
- This does NOT change the energy content in our area
- This proposal typical enriches the lobbyists that create the programs, creating bad incentives to actually create clean energy in our area
- The PJM interchange (which handles our area) is the ONLY interchange without a majority of clean energy content
- The current and former chair of the Teaneck Environmental Commission expressed reservations about this plan.
Every year, the township’s finances are audited by an independent Auditing Firm.
The Audit Results are in for 2020.
You can read the entire audit report and see the results (deficiencies) here:
Report of Audit
Current and Former Chairs of the Environmental commission weigh in on the Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) proposal:
These days, there’s a lot of misinformation and it’s very hard to know what to believe.
For Municipal Question #2, Community Choice Aggregation, here are the experts:
“I think it’s important we’re careful with our language. Community Choice Aggregation [CCA is Municipal Question #2] will not improve the environment of Teaneck. It will support renewable energy credit swaps which overall, in the long term, can help mitigate climate change. The more that we’re encouraging renewable energies um – and I think for the broader environment – absolutely makes a huge difference.
But it’s not gonna affect Teaneck’s environment, in any way um — measurable way.
Chair, Teaneck Environmental Commission
(October 20, 2021)
“What seems like a good idea, with a very small actual impact on climate change, is structured in such a way that a small group of former utility officials stand to benefit handsomely if this legislation passes for a dubious amount of actual work. That seems wrong to me. There are far better ways to incentivize local green energy purchases than enriching people who were once the regulators and grouped NJ with the highest polluting states, all coal dependent. We need a disinterested 3rd party to analyze this and given the animosity between the Council majority and proponents on both of these measures, it is hard to see how this helps or hurts. At this point, I would vote NO, but reserve judgment on the idea itself.”
Former Chair, Teaneck Environmental Commission
(October 22, 2021)